Observation:
Dec 2014: 0.98 (+ more) Updated: Mar 2, 2015 2:26 PM CSTDec 2014: | 0.98 | |
Nov 2014: | 0.12 | |
Oct 2014: | 0.16 | |
Sep 2014: | 0.10 | |
Aug 2014: | 0.10 |
Units:
Percent,Frequency:
MonthlyData in this graph are copyrighted. Please review the copyright information in the series notes before sharing.
Title | Release Dates | |
|
||
Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities | 2012-09-04 | 2024-05-01 |
Source | ||
|
||
Chauvet, Marcelle | 2012-09-04 | 2019-06-30 |
Piger, Jeremy Max | 2012-09-04 | 2019-06-30 |
Chauvet, Marcelle | 2019-07-01 | 2024-05-01 |
Piger, Jeremy Max | 2019-07-01 | 2024-05-01 |
Release | ||
|
||
U.S. Recession Probabilities | 2012-09-04 | 2024-05-01 |
Units | ||
|
||
Percent | 2012-09-04 | 2024-05-01 |
Frequency | ||
|
||
Monthly | 2012-09-04 | 2024-05-01 |
Seasonal Adjustment | ||
|
||
Not Seasonally Adjusted | 2012-09-04 | 2024-05-01 |
Notes | ||
|
||
Smoothed recession probabilities for the United States are obtained from a dynamic-factor markov-switching model applied to four monthly coincident variables: non-farm payroll employment, the index of industrial production, real personal income excluding transfer payments, and real manufacturing and trade sales. This model was originally developed in Chauvet, M., "An Economic Characterization of Business Cycle Dynamics with Factor Structure and Regime Switching," International Economic Review, 1998, 39, 969-996. (http://faculty.ucr.edu/~chauvet/ier.pdf) For additional details, including an analysis of the performance of this model for dating business cycles in real time, see: Chauvet, M. and J. Piger, “A Comparison of the Real-Time Performance of Business Cycle Dating Methods,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2008, 26, 42-49. (http://pages.uoregon.edu/jpiger/research/published-papers/chauvet-and-piger_2008_jour.pdf) For additional details as to why this data revises, see FAQ 3 at http://pages.uoregon.edu/jpiger/us_recession_probs.htm. |
2012-09-04 | 2019-06-30 |
Smoothed recession probabilities for the United States are obtained from a dynamic-factor markov-switching model applied to four monthly coincident variables: non-farm payroll employment, the index of industrial production, real personal income excluding transfer payments, and real manufacturing and trade sales. This model was originally developed in Chauvet, M., "An Economic Characterization of Business Cycle Dynamics with Factor Structure and Regime Switching," International Economic Review, 1998, 39, 969-996. For additional details, including an analysis of the performance of this model for dating business cycles in real time, see: Chauvet, M. and J. Piger, "A" class="breakable" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://pages.uoregon.edu/jpiger/research/published-papers/chauvet-and-piger_2008_jour.pdf">A Comparison of the Real-Time Performance of Business Cycle Dating Methods (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f2ed/8fac87c0c82c3d85ca64ee9846658d8810fb.pdf?_ga=2.168797348.404457612.1561570817-1723670870.1561570817)," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2008, 26, 42-49. For additional details as to why this data revises, see FAQ 3 (http://pages.uoregon.edu/jpiger/us_recession_probs.htm). |
2019-07-01 | 2024-05-01 |